Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison
Open Charts RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERAX vs. WBIGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERAX is a Buy and WBIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WBIGX (1.06B). RERAX pays higher dividends than WBIGX: RERAX (2.21) vs WBIGX (1.01). RERAX was incepted earlier than WBIGX: RERAX (24 years) vs WBIGX (34 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than WBIGX (1.31). WBIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBIGX: RERAX (250) vs WBIGX (2500). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.73 vs. WBIGX (-3.37). RERAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.17 vs. WBIGX (-33.52).
| RERAX | WBIGX | RERAX / WBIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.15 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.31 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.861 | 11.274 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.06B | 13,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.01 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | -3.37 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.54 | 14.52 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.17 | -33.52 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.30 | 26.78 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers