Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison
Open Charts RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERAX vs. WBIGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERAX is a Hold and WBIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. WBIGX (1.13B). RERAX pays higher dividends than WBIGX: RERAX (2.25) vs WBIGX (0.98). RERAX was incepted earlier than WBIGX: RERAX (24 years) vs WBIGX (34 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than WBIGX (1.31). WBIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBIGX: RERAX (250) vs WBIGX (2500). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. WBIGX (1.24). RERAX return over 5 years is better than : -10.37 vs. WBIGX (-28.39).
| RERAX | WBIGX | RERAX / WBIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.15 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.31 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.693 | 13.775 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141B | 1.13B | 12,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.98 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 1.24 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.38 | 8.05 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.37 | -28.39 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.08 | 31.12 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement