Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison
Open Charts RERAX vs WBIGX
RERAX vs WBIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERAX vs. WBIGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERAX is a Hold and WBIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. WBIGX (1.18B). RERAX pays higher dividends than WBIGX: RERAX (2.19) vs WBIGX (0.98). RERAX was incepted earlier than WBIGX: RERAX (24 years) vs WBIGX (34 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than WBIGX (1.31). WBIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBIGX: RERAX (250) vs WBIGX (2500). RERAX (8.65) and WBIGX (8.50) have marching annual gain over last year. RERAX return over 5 years is better than : -10.14 vs. WBIGX (-24.63).
| RERAX | WBIGX | RERAX / WBIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.15 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.31 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.100 | 18.507 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 1.18B | 12,139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 0.98 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 8.50 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 16.72 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.14 | -24.63 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.33 | 43.47 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement