Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFEBX vs RWMFX
RFEBX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RFEBX vs RWMFX
RFEBX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFEBX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFEBX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RFEBX (173B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RFEBX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RFEBX (0.19). RFEBX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RFEBX (12 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RFEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RFEBX (26.00). RFEBX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.36 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RFEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.97 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| RFEBX | RWMFX | RFEBX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.31 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.31 | 348% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.886 | 5.575 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 214B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.40 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.36 | 8.10 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.77 | 33.11 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.97 | 26.71 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.52 | 85.42 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement