Ad is loading...
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$15.80
Change-$1.04 (-6.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.39M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 41.6M vs. RFISX (29.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). RFISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.75 vs. WCMLX (-9.95). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. RFISX (38.71).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.86 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.269 | -9.253 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4M | 41.6M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.75 | -9.95 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.83 | -6.42 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.71 | 62.99 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers