Ad is loading...
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$16.46
Change+$0.31 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.43M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.28
Change+$0.27 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 39.3M vs. RFISX (28.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). RFISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.92 vs. WCMLX (-10.85). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. RFISX (12.86).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.86 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.068 | -14.386 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4M | 39.3M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.92 | -10.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.61 | -5.33 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.86 | 25.40 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...