Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.61
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.41M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.17
Change+$0.39 (+2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.17M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 45.2M vs. RFISX (21.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. RFISX (0.80). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.82 vs. RFISX (-1.89).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.79 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.029 | 7.154 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4M | 45.2M | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 5.59 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 27.83 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.89 | 22.82 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.82 | N/A | - |