Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.74
Change+$0.29 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.95
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.33M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 44.3M vs. RFISX (22M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. RFISX (0.29). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. RFISX (-10.10).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.79 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.910 | 6.843 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 44.3M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 4.73 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.50 | 34.97 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.10 | 12.53 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement