Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.35
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.14M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.62
Change+$0.13 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.17M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 42.2M vs. RFISX (30.1M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.97 vs. RFISX (0.00). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 19.52 vs. RFISX (0.00).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.79 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.176 | -2.877 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.1M | 42.2M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.02 | 23.54 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.00 | 19.52 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement