Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.18
Change-$0.16 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.27M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.03M
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 43M vs. RFISX (28.3M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.46 vs. RFISX (-0.17). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 14.44 vs. RFISX (-8.62).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.79 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.396 | -0.156 | 3,470% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.3M | 43M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | 3.46 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.77 | 12.83 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.62 | 14.44 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement