Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMLX
RFISX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 47.7M vs. RFISX (11.9M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFISX (15 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.57). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RFISX (49.34). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. RFISX (-8.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. RFISX (-33.11).
| RFISX | WCMLX | RFISX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.99 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.79 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.384 | 3.852 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9M | 47.7M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.98 | 2.81 | -320% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.88 | 23.40 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.11 | -7.51 | 441% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement