Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFNCX vs VTSMX
RFNCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts RFNCX vs VTSMX
RFNCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFNCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNCX is a Hold and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.31T vs. RFNCX (183B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than RFNCX: VTSMX (0.93) vs RFNCX (0.33). RFNCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: RFNCX (24 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). RFNCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.06). RFNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. VTSMX (3.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFNCX: VTSMX (0) vs RFNCX (250). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.48 vs. RFNCX (21.35). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 66.53 vs. RFNCX (35.27).
| RFNCX | VTSMX | RFNCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.06 | 1,550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.06 | 1,550% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.327 | 9.330 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 2.31T | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.35 | 23.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.57 | 69.02 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.27 | 66.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 258.90 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers