Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFNGX vs VTSMX
RFNGX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts RFNGX vs VTSMX
RFNGX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFNGX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNGX is a Hold and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.31T vs. RFNGX (183B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than RFNGX: VTSMX (0.93) vs RFNGX (0.85). RFNGX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: RFNGX (17 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). RFNGX (0.28) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.06). RFNGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. VTSMX (3.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFNGX: VTSMX (0) vs RFNGX (250). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.19 vs. RFNGX (23.58). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 68.72 vs. RFNGX (43.76).
| RFNGX | VTSMX | RFNGX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.06 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.06 | 467% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.698 | 10.391 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 2.31T | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.58 | 26.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.77 | 72.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.76 | 68.72 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.01 | 268.89 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement