Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAAX vs WFPDX
RGAAX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAAX vs WFPDX
RGAAX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAAX vs. WFPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAAX is a Buy and WFPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WFPDX (1.24B). RGAAX (0.00) and WFPDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGAAX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGAAX (24 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than WFPDX (1.08). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGAAX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. WFPDX (-25.55). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.72 vs. WFPDX (-50.00).
| RGAAX | WFPDX | RGAAX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.00 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.08 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.490 | -0.684 | -1,242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.24B | 28,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | -25.55 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.28 | -8.54 | -413% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.72 | -50.00 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.80 | -29.47 | -288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement