Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAAX vs WFPDX
RGAAX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAAX vs WFPDX
RGAAX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAAX vs. WFPDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAAX is a Hold and WFPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WFPDX (1.39B). RGAAX (0.00) and WFPDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGAAX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGAAX (24 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than WFPDX (1.08). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGAAX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. WFPDX (-8.03). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.12 vs. WFPDX (-38.77).
| RGAAX | WFPDX | RGAAX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.00 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.08 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.734 | 7.324 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 1.39B | 24,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.57 | -8.03 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.79 | -10.50 | -426% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.12 | -38.77 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.15 | -23.84 | -378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers