Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAAX vs WOFRX
RGAAX vs WOFRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAAX vs WOFRX
RGAAX vs WOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAAX vs. WOFRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAAX is a Buy and WOFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WOFRX (1.88B). RGAAX (0.00) and WOFRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGAAX was incepted earlier than WOFRX: RGAAX (24 years) vs WOFRX (6 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than WOFRX (0.77). RGAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFRX (21.00). WOFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAAX: WOFRX (0) vs RGAAX (250). WOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.61 vs. RGAAX (-2.14). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.72 vs. WOFRX (-0.85).
| RGAAX | WOFRX | RGAAX / WOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.69 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.77 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.490 | 9.745 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.88B | 18,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 2.61 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.28 | 23.71 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.72 | -0.85 | -555% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement