Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WBGSX
RGABX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WBGSX
RGABX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WBGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WBGSX (206M). RGABX (0.00) and WBGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGABX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than WBGSX (1.25). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGABX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.41 vs. WBGSX (-22.46). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 9.07 vs. WBGSX (-44.56).
| RGABX | WBGSX | RGABX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.20 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.25 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.887 | 7.164 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 206M | 166,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | -22.46 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.99 | -27.55 | -145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.07 | -44.56 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.10 | -43.77 | -188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement