Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLCGX
RGABX vs WLCGX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLCGX
RGABX vs WLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLCGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WLCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLCGX (286M). WLCGX pays higher dividends than RGABX: WLCGX (0.11) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than WLCGX: RGABX (24 years) vs WLCGX (30 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than WLCGX (1.00). WLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCGX: RGABX (250) vs WLCGX (250000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. WLCGX (-9.07). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.33 vs. WLCGX (-3.96).
| RGABX | WLCGX | RGABX / WLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.00 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.00 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.489 | 6.068 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 286M | 123,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | -9.07 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.88 | 46.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.33 | -3.96 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.62 | 41.19 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers