Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.39
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.39
Change+$0.19 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.73B
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WLGRX (7.73B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.22). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. WLGRX (4.12). WLGRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.95 vs. RGABX (26.47).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.14 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.22 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.011 | 6.308 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.73B | 4,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 4.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.76 | 46.91 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 27.95 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.13 | 82.33 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement