Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.16
Change+$0.59 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$36.41
Change+$0.23 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.04B
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WLGRX (8.04B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (23 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.24). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.92 vs. WLGRX (10.17). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.19 vs. WLGRX (30.38).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.14 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.24 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.181 | 8.681 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.04B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 10.17 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.62 | 60.30 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.19 | 30.38 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.66 | 96.31 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement