Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.53
Change+$0.29 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8B
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WLGRX (8B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (23 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.24). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.53 vs. WLGRX (10.13). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.44 vs. WLGRX (27.95).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.14 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.24 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.716 | 5.197 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 8B | 4,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.53 | 10.13 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.61 | 43.06 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.44 | 27.95 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.62 | 96.30 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement