Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WLGRX
RGABX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WLGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLGRX (6.23B). RGABX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGABX (24 years) vs WLGRX (21 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.23). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGRX (24.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: WLGRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. WLGRX (-4.71). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.33 vs. WLGRX (2.16).
| RGABX | WLGRX | RGABX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.14 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.23 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.489 | 2.782 | 305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.23B | 5,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | -4.71 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.88 | 30.03 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.33 | 2.16 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.62 | 91.93 | 94% |