Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs RSGRX
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs RSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.59
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. RSGRX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and RSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RSGRX (370M). RGACX pays higher dividends than RSGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs RSGRX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than RSGRX: RGACX (23 years) vs RSGRX (33 years). RSGRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGRX: RGACX (250) vs RSGRX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.28 vs. RSGRX (15.69). RSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.86 vs. RGACX (46.76).
| RGACX | RSGRX | RGACX / RSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.17 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.502 | 13.739 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 370M | 90,811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.28 | 15.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.54 | 82.81 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.76 | 55.86 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | 93.46 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement