Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs RSGRX
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs RSGRX
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. RSGRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and RSGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. RSGRX (377M). RGACX (0.00) and RSGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than RSGRX: RGACX (24 years) vs RSGRX (34 years). RSGRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RSGRX (24.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGRX: RGACX (250) vs RSGRX (2500). RSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. RGACX (0.48). RSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.22 vs. RGACX (14.34).
| RGACX | RSGRX | RGACX / RSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.272 | 7.017 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 377M | 93,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 3.38 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 70.94 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.34 | 36.22 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.67 | 105.16 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement