Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs RSGRX
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs RSGRX
RGACX vs RSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. RSGRX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and RSGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RSGRX (377M). RGACX (0.00) and RSGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than RSGRX: RGACX (24 years) vs RSGRX (34 years). RSGRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RSGRX (24.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGRX: RGACX (250) vs RSGRX (2500). RSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. RGACX (-0.31). RSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 30.78 vs. RGACX (9.25).
| RGACX | RSGRX | RGACX / RSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.467 | 3.610 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 377M | 94,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 6.82 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.18 | 57.58 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.25 | 30.78 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.53 | 101.19 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers