Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SCGSX
RGACX vs SCGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SCGSX
RGACX vs SCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SCGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SCGSX (2.22B). RGACX (0.00) and SCGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SCGSX: RGACX (24 years) vs SCGSX (26 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SCGSX (0.66). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCGSX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGSX: RGACX (250) vs SCGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. SCGSX (7.21). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. SCGSX (9.18).
| RGACX | SCGSX | RGACX / SCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.66 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.66 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.185 | 4.399 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 2.22B | 16,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 7.21 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | 32.37 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.23 | 9.18 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.97 | 106.08 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement