Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGFFX
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGFFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SGFFX (74.5M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SGFFX: RGACX (0.07) vs SGFFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SGFFX: RGACX (23 years) vs SGFFX (27 years). SGFFX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SGFFX (20.81). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGFFX: RGACX (250) vs SGFFX (1000). SGFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.28 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. SGFFX (35.78).
| RGACX | SGFFX | RGACX / SGFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.85 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.85 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 11.898 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 74.5M | 445,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 26.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 52.69 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 35.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 169.82 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement