Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGFFX
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGFFX
RGACX vs SGFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGFFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SGFFX (75.3M). RGACX (0.00) and SGFFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SGFFX: RGACX (24 years) vs SGFFX (28 years). SGFFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SGFFX (2.25). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGFFX: RGACX (250) vs SGFFX (1000). SGFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. RGACX (3.68). RGACX (13.46) and SGFFX (13.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGACX | SGFFX | RGACX / SGFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.78 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.78 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 2.929 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 75.3M | 474,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 9.42 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 65.56 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 13.17 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 212.99 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement