Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGRAX
RGACX vs SGRAX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGRAX
RGACX vs SGRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGRAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SGRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SGRAX (3.06B). RGACX (0.00) and SGRAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SGRAX: RGACX (24 years) vs SGRAX (26 years). SGRAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). SGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGRAX: RGACX (250) vs SGRAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. SGRAX (-25.29). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. SGRAX (-57.18).
| RGACX | SGRAX | RGACX / SGRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.12 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.17 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 4.749 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 3.06B | 11,663% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | -25.29 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | -27.98 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | -57.18 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | -51.70 | -189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers