Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGRNX
RGACX vs SGRNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGRNX
RGACX vs SGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGRNX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SGRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SGRNX (3.15B). RGACX (0.00) and SGRNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SGRNX: RGACX (24 years) vs SGRNX (26 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SGRNX (0.86). SGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGRNX: RGACX (250) vs SGRNX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. SGRNX (-2.86). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. SGRNX (-27.51).
| RGACX | SGRNX | RGACX / SGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.86 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.116 | 6.998 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.15B | 11,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | -2.86 | -405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.05 | 10.13 | 445% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.23 | -27.51 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.89 | -0.86 | -12,502% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers