Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SGZFX
RGACX vs SGZFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SGZFX
RGACX vs SGZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SGZFX commentary
Jul 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SGZFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SGZFX (78.5M). RGACX (0.00) and SGZFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SGZFX: RGACX (24 years) vs SGZFX (9 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SGZFX (0.75). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SGZFX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGZFX: RGACX (250) vs SGZFX (1000). SGZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. RGACX (-2.03). SGZFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.41 vs. RGACX (7.57).
| RGACX | SGZFX | RGACX / SGZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.221 | 2.549 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 78.5M | 454,777% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.03 | 6.47 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.48 | 48.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.57 | 33.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement