Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SMMIX
RGACX vs SMMIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SMMIX
RGACX vs SMMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SMMIX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SMMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SMMIX (3.51B). RGACX (0.00) and SMMIX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SMMIX: RGACX (24 years) vs SMMIX (44 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SMMIX (0.82). SMMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). SMMIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SMMIX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. SMMIX (-1.69). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.37 vs. SMMIX (-10.38).
| RGACX | SMMIX | RGACX / SMMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.82 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.82 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.695 | 5.113 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.51B | 10,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -1.69 | -321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.34 | 43.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.37 | -10.38 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.88 | 89.25 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement