Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SPFCX
RGACX vs SPFCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SPFCX
RGACX vs SPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SPFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SPFCX (1.7B). RGACX (0.00) and SPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SPFCX: RGACX (24 years) vs SPFCX (26 years). SPFCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPFCX (30.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPFCX: RGACX (250) vs SPFCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. SPFCX (7.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. SPFCX (13.87).
| RGACX | SPFCX | RGACX / SPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.78 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.84 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.443 | 2.662 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.7B | 21,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 7.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.49 | 63.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.76 | 13.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.85 | 93.38 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers