Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SPFZX
RGACX vs SPFZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SPFZX
RGACX vs SPFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SPFZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SPFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SPFZX (1.74B). RGACX (0.00) and SPFZX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SPFZX: RGACX (24 years) vs SPFZX (26 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SPFZX (0.78). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPFZX (30.00). SPFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SPFZX (0) vs RGACX (250). SPFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.33 vs. RGACX (3.68). SPFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.31 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| RGACX | SPFZX | RGACX / SPFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.78 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 6.079 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.74B | 20,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 10.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 70.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 26.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 176.22 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement