Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SPFZX
RGACX vs SPFZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SPFZX
RGACX vs SPFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SPFZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SPFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SPFZX (1.71B). RGACX (0.00) and SPFZX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SPFZX: RGACX (24 years) vs SPFZX (26 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SPFZX (0.78). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPFZX (30.00). SPFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SPFZX (0) vs RGACX (250). SPFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.71 vs. RGACX (7.94). SPFZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| RGACX | SPFZX | RGACX / SPFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.78 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.185 | 5.308 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.71B | 21,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 15.71 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | 76.49 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.23 | 27.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.97 | 191.78 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement