Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SSGFX
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SSGFX
RGACX vs SSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SSGFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. SSGFX (85.1M). RGACX (0.00) and SSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than SSGFX: RGACX (24 years) vs SSGFX (39 years). SSGFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSGFX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGFX: RGACX (250) vs SSGFX (1000). SSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.72 vs. RGACX (14.24). SSGFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.60 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| RGACX | SSGFX | RGACX / SSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.98 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 11.646 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 85.1M | 397,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 26.72 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 70.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 55.60 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.79 | 215.06 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers