Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STDFX
RGACX vs STDFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STDFX
RGACX vs STDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STDFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. STDFX (930M). RGACX (0.00) and STDFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than STDFX: RGACX (24 years) vs STDFX (16 years). STDFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). STDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STDFX: RGACX (250) vs STDFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. STDFX (-12.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. STDFX (-25.61).
| RGACX | STDFX | RGACX / STDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.94 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.819 | 3.897 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 930M | 37,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -12.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 7.40 | 550% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | -25.61 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.31 | -5.28 | -1,917% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers