Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STFFX
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.01
Change+$0.47 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Allspring Large Cap Growth R6
Price$52.74
Change+$0.27 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STFFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STFFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. STFFX (1.04B). RGACX pays higher dividends than STFFX: RGACX (0.07) vs STFFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGACX (23 years) vs STFFX (13 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.76). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: STFFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. STFFX (6.97). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. STFFX (-4.29).
| RGACX | STFFX | RGACX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.60 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.76 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.475 | 17.409 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 1.04B | 32,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 6.97 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.11 | 48.81 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | -4.29 | -989% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.13 | 9.53 | 1,061% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement