Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STFFX
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Allspring Large Cap Growth R6
Price$50.85
Change-$0.55 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.63M
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STFFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and STFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. STFFX (992M). RGACX pays higher dividends than STFFX: RGACX (0.07) vs STFFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGACX (24 years) vs STFFX (13 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.76). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: STFFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. STFFX (-0.18). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. STFFX (-8.61).
| RGACX | STFFX | RGACX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.60 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.76 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.460 | 13.784 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 992M | 32,964% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | -0.18 | -3,608% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.11 | 35.71 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.00 | -8.61 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 1.52 | 5,639% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement