Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STFFX
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STFFX
RGACX vs STFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and STFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. STFFX (942M). RGACX (0.00) and STFFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than STFFX: RGACX (24 years) vs STFFX (14 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than STFFX (0.75). STFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). STFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: STFFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. STFFX (1.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. STFFX (-17.35).
| RGACX | STFFX | RGACX / STFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.75 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.185 | 3.285 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 942M | 38,323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 1.09 | 731% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | 14.10 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.23 | -17.35 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.97 | 7.61 | 1,418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement