Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STNFX
RGACX vs STNFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STNFX
RGACX vs STNFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STNFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STNFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. STNFX (953M). RGACX (0.00) and STNFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than STNFX: RGACX (24 years) vs STNFX (16 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than STNFX (0.85). STNFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STNFX: RGACX (250) vs STNFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. STNFX (-4.04). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. STNFX (-20.14).
| RGACX | STNFX | RGACX / STNFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.70 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.85 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 4.374 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 953M | 37,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | -4.04 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 10.27 | 361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | -20.14 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 0.42 | 23,365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement