Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SWLGX
RGACX vs SWLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SWLGX
RGACX vs SWLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SWLGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SWLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. SWLGX (4.83B). SWLGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: SWLGX (0.43) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SWLGX: RGACX (24 years) vs SWLGX (9 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SWLGX (0.04). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SWLGX (16.00). SWLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SWLGX (0) vs RGACX (250). SWLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. RGACX (-0.31). SWLGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.99 vs. RGACX (9.25).
| RGACX | SWLGX | RGACX / SWLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.04 | 2,657% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.04 | 2,657% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.467 | 2.453 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 4.83B | 7,396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 11.42 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.18 | 91.67 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.25 | 96.99 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement