Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SWLGX
RGACX vs SWLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SWLGX
RGACX vs SWLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SWLGX commentary
Jun 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SWLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SWLGX (4.88B). SWLGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: SWLGX (0.42) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SWLGX: RGACX (24 years) vs SWLGX (8 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SWLGX (0.04). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SWLGX (16.00). SWLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: SWLGX (0) vs RGACX (250). SWLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.30 vs. RGACX (8.33). SWLGX return over 5 years is better than : 121.33 vs. RGACX (15.42).
| RGACX | SWLGX | RGACX / SWLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.04 | 2,657% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.04 | 2,657% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.061 | 3.879 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 4.88B | 7,398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 22.30 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 106.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | 121.33 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement