Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl
Price$25.19
Change-$0.42 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.07M
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TGCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. TGCNX (731M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TGCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs TGCNX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCNX: RGACX (24 years) vs TGCNX (27 years). TGCNX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TGCNX (12.77). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCNX: RGACX (250) vs TGCNX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. TGCNX (-9.68). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. TGCNX (-22.23).
| RGACX | TGCNX | RGACX / TGCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.93 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.06 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 8.765 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 731M | 45,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -9.68 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.28 | 13.62 | 443% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.90 | -22.23 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.84 | -10.10 | -840% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement