Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGCNX
RGACX vs TGCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGCNX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TGCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TGCNX (665M). RGACX (0.00) and TGCNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TGCNX: RGACX (24 years) vs TGCNX (28 years). TGCNX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TGCNX (16.69). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGCNX: RGACX (250) vs TGCNX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. TGCNX (-11.72). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.51 vs. TGCNX (-39.48).
| RGACX | TGCNX | RGACX / TGCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.06 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.560 | 5.523 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 665M | 53,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.70 | -11.72 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.09 | 5.96 | 706% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.51 | -39.48 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.22 | -7.26 | -1,367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement