Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGWFX
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGWFX
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TGWFX (352M). RGACX (0.00) and TGWFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: RGACX (24 years) vs TGWFX (26 years). TGWFX (0.97) and RGACX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: RGACX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. TGWFX (-18.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. TGWFX (-38.98).
| RGACX | TGWFX | RGACX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.97 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 2.705 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 352M | 101,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | -18.94 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 8.08 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | -38.98 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 29.64 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement