Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TGWFX
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TGWFX
RGACX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TGWFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. TGWFX (348M). RGACX (0.00) and TGWFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: RGACX (24 years) vs TGWFX (26 years). TGWFX (0.97) and RGACX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: RGACX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. TGWFX (-20.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. TGWFX (-40.07).
| RGACX | TGWFX | RGACX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.97 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.193 | 2.443 | 376% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 348M | 98,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | -20.73 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.95 | 17.99 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.75 | -40.07 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.44 | 25.72 | 375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement