Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TRJZX
RGACX vs TRJZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TRJZX
RGACX vs TRJZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TRJZX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TRJZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRJZX (48B). TRJZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: TRJZX (0.11) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TRJZX: RGACX (24 years) vs TRJZX (6 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than TRJZX (0.51). TRJZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGACX (32.00). TRJZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: TRJZX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. TRJZX (-5.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. TRJZX (-5.98).
| RGACX | TRJZX | RGACX / TRJZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.51 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.589 | -0.808 | -444% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 48B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -5.71 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 30.20 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.33 | -5.98 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement