Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TRJZX
RGACX vs TRJZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TRJZX
RGACX vs TRJZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TRJZX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TRJZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRJZX (49.4B). TRJZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: TRJZX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TRJZX: RGACX (24 years) vs TRJZX (6 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than TRJZX (0.51). TRJZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGACX (32.00). TRJZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: TRJZX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. TRJZX (4.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.27 vs. TRJZX (5.68).
| RGACX | TRJZX | RGACX / TRJZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.51 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.322 | 1.680 | 555% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 49.4B | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 4.01 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.44 | 38.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.27 | 5.68 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement