Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TRSAX
RGACX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TRSAX
RGACX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TRSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TRSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TRSAX (52.6B). RGACX (0.00) and TRSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: RGACX (24 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) and TRSAX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: RGACX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. TRSAX (8.54). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. TRSAX (8.86).
| RGACX | TRSAX | RGACX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 7.332 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 52.6B | 643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 8.54 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 44.09 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 8.86 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.79 | 115.45 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement