Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TRSAX
RGACX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TRSAX
RGACX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TRSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TRSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRSAX (48.7B). RGACX (0.00) and TRSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: RGACX (24 years) vs TRSAX (25 years). RGACX (0.93) and TRSAX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: RGACX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. TRSAX (-8.35). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. TRSAX (-8.69).
| RGACX | TRSAX | RGACX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.819 | 1.341 | 658% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 48.7B | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -8.35 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 28.66 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | -8.69 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.31 | 99.73 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers