Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TSNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TSNCX (2.22B). RGACX (0.00) and TSNCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TSNCX: RGACX (24 years) vs TSNCX (16 years). TSNCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). TSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSNCX: RGACX (250) vs TSNCX (2500). TSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. RGACX (7.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. TSNCX (-7.69).
| RGACX | TSNCX | RGACX / TSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.01 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.185 | 6.599 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 2.22B | 16,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 11.83 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.05 | 72.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.23 | -7.69 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.97 | 10.07 | 1,072% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement