Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TSNCX
RGACX vs TSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TSNCX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TSNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TSNCX (2.04B). RGACX (0.00) and TSNCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TSNCX: RGACX (24 years) vs TSNCX (16 years). TSNCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). TSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSNCX: RGACX (250) vs TSNCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. TSNCX (-3.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. TSNCX (-16.92).
| RGACX | TSNCX | RGACX / TSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.01 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.108 | 2.764 | 293% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 2.04B | 17,287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -3.75 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.74 | 68.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.61 | -16.92 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.20 | -4.45 | -2,208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement