Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCAX
RGACX vs TWCAX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCAX
RGACX vs TWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TWCAX (6B). RGACX (0.00) and TWCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCAX: RGACX (24 years) vs TWCAX (29 years). TWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCAX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCAX: RGACX (250) vs TWCAX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. TWCAX (-1.79). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. TWCAX (3.72).
| RGACX | TWCAX | RGACX / TWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.589 | -0.942 | -381% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6B | 5,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -1.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 26.11 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.33 | 3.72 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.18 | 109.37 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement