Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCIX
RGACX vs TWCIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCIX
RGACX vs TWCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TWCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TWCIX (6.4B). RGACX (0.00) and TWCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCIX: RGACX (24 years) vs TWCIX (55 years). TWCIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCIX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCIX: RGACX (250) vs TWCIX (2500). TWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. RGACX (3.68). TWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.33 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| RGACX | TWCIX | RGACX / TWCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 4.541 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.4B | 5,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 6.67 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 35.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 14.33 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 134.76 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement