Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCIX
RGACX vs TWCIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCIX
RGACX vs TWCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCIX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TWCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TWCIX (6.74B). RGACX (0.00) and TWCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCIX: RGACX (24 years) vs TWCIX (55 years). TWCIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCIX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCIX: RGACX (250) vs TWCIX (2500). TWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.49 vs. RGACX (14.24). TWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.13 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| RGACX | TWCIX | RGACX / TWCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 9.238 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.74B | 5,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 17.49 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 49.77 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 32.13 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.79 | 150.42 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement