Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs VRLCX
RGACX vs VRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs VRLCX
RGACX vs VRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. VRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and VRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. VRLCX (3.45B). RGACX (0.00) and VRLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than VRLCX: RGACX (24 years) vs VRLCX (11 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than VRLCX (0.68). VRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). VRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: VRLCX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. VRLCX (-3.20). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. VRLCX (-19.22).
| RGACX | VRLCX | RGACX / VRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.67 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.68 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.819 | -5.864 | -150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.45B | 10,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -3.20 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 41.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | -19.22 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.31 | 7.91 | 1,281% |