Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.29B
William Blair Growth N
Price$8.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.18M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. WBGSX (227M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.08) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. WBGSX (-20.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 48.55 vs. WBGSX (-11.21).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.168 | -0.910 | -678% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 227M | 136,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | -20.38 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.42 | 3.81 | 1,401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.55 | -11.21 | -433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.38 | -38.18 | -190% |