Ad is loading...
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.89
Change+$1.02 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
William Blair Growth N
Price$7.51
Change+$0.15 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.39M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. WBGSX (198M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.09) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.75 vs. WBGSX (-31.15). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.89 vs. WBGSX (-14.72).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.26 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.862 | -16.268 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 198M | 131,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.75 | -31.15 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.76 | -28.05 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.89 | -14.72 | -305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.51 | -48.06 | -99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...