Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.15B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.39
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.46M
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WBGSX (241M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WBGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. WBGSX (-13.45). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.02 vs. WBGSX (-11.98).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.724 | 6.143 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 241M | 135,685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | -13.45 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.62 | 4.48 | 1,197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.02 | -11.98 | -384% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.69 | -33.74 | -251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement