Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WBGSX
RGACX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WBGSX (226M). RGACX (0.00) and WBGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: RGACX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. WBGSX (-21.23). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. WBGSX (-43.84).
| RGACX | WBGSX | RGACX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.25 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | 7.463 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 226M | 157,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | -21.23 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | -29.41 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | -43.84 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | -43.08 | -227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement