Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFPDX
RGACX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFPDX
RGACX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFPDX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WFPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WFPDX (1.27B). RGACX (0.00) and WFPDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGACX (24 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGACX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. WFPDX (-22.21). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. WFPDX (-48.39).
| RGACX | WFPDX | RGACX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.00 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.08 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.397 | -0.098 | -5,526% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.27B | 28,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | -22.21 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.65 | -21.49 | -157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.91 | -48.39 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | -30.69 | -308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement