Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFPDX
RGACX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFPDX
RGACX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WFPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WFPDX (1.24B). RGACX (0.00) and WFPDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGACX (24 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGACX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. WFPDX (-25.55). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. WFPDX (-50.00).
| RGACX | WFPDX | RGACX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.00 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.08 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.819 | -0.684 | -1,290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.24B | 28,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -25.55 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | -8.54 | -476% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.82 | -50.00 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.31 | -29.47 | -344% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement