Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WLGYX
RGACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.90
Change-$0.34 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.01B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$39.61
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
RGACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. WLGYX (8.1B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: RGACX (0.07) vs WLGYX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: RGACX (23 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: WLGYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. WLGYX (6.97). WLGYX (43.62) and RGACX (41.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGACX | WLGYX | RGACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.988 | 4.347 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 8.1B | 3,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 6.97 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.39 | 48.02 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.58 | 43.62 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.84 | 97.65 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement