Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$47.13
Change-$0.59 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.65M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. WPCSX (693M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. WPCSX (-9.74). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. WPCSX (1.02).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 3.829 | 388% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 693M | 47,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -9.74 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.28 | 14.96 | 403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.90 | 1.02 | 3,041% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.84 | 69.34 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers