Ad is loading...
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$46.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.35M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. WPCSX (722M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGACX (0.08) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. WPCSX (-6.07). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. WPCSX (21.06).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.667 | 0.675 | -395% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 722M | 39,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | -6.07 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.70 | 12.74 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.87 | 21.06 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.36 | 64.78 | 90% |