Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.01
Change+$0.47 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$50.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.26M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WPCSX (736M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. WPCSX (-4.56). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. WPCSX (12.88).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.475 | 8.507 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 736M | 46,332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | -4.56 | -313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.11 | 31.41 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 12.88 | 329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.13 | 80.17 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement