Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPCSX (476M). RGACX (0.00) and WPCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. WPCSX (-12.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.27 vs. WPCSX (-22.70).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.322 | -6.463 | -144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 476M | 75,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -12.39 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.44 | -4.73 | -961% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.27 | -22.70 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.14 | 61.05 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers