Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPCSX (466M). RGACX (0.00) and WPCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. WPCSX (-13.84). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.14 vs. WPCSX (-25.46).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.360 | -5.098 | -144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 466M | 77,468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | -13.84 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.76 | -4.60 | -908% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.14 | -25.46 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 57.95 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers