Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.97
Change-$0.12 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$57.90
Change-$0.20 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.58M
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WPSZX (737M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.07). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (23 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. WPSZX (-2.79). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.85 vs. WPSZX (20.56).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.419 | 9.540 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 737M | 46,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | -2.79 | -473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.02 | 39.69 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.85 | 20.56 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.66 | 107.26 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement