Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WPSZX (451M). RGACX (0.00) and WPSZX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.74). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. WPSZX (-9.86). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. WPSZX (-17.83).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.73 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.74 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.193 | -1.868 | -492% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 451M | 75,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | -9.86 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.95 | 3.96 | 1,136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.75 | -17.83 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.44 | 80.44 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement