Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WPSZX (466M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: WPSZX (0.03) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.74). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. WPSZX (-10.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. WPSZX (-17.87).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.73 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.74 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.959 | -4.102 | -170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 466M | 76,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | -10.58 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | -0.03 | -113,378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | -17.87 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.58 | 83.16 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement