Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.95
Change+$0.71 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.73
Change+$0.24 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.63M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WSACX (62.6M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.06). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (23 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.14 vs. WSACX (16.41). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. WSACX (24.31).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.446 | 6.194 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 62.6M | 519,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.14 | 16.41 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.52 | 17.55 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | 24.31 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.86 | 25.77 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement