Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$31.81
Change-$0.26 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.19M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. WSACX (67.2M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.06). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (24 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. RGACX (6.60). RGACX (30.90) and WSACX (29.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 14.548 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 67.2M | 491,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.06 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 8.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.28 | 32.32 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.90 | 29.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.84 | 37.11 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement