Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$0.56 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$32.37
Change-$0.23 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.52M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WSACX (68.5M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.06). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (23 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. RGACX (14.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. WSACX (33.36).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 17.393 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 68.5M | 500,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.06 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.51 | 17.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.98 | 40.10 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 33.36 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.82 | 40.46 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement