Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WSACX (77.8M). RGACX (0.00) and WSACX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (24 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WSACX (20.39). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.28 vs. RGACX (14.24). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.57 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 16.824 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 77.8M | 434,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 37.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 76.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 35.57 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.79 | 65.83 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers