Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAEX vs WFPDX
RGAEX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts RGAEX vs WFPDX
RGAEX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAEX vs. WFPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAEX is a Buy and WFPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WFPDX (1.24B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than WFPDX: RGAEX (0.21) vs WFPDX (0.00). RGAEX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: RGAEX (24 years) vs WFPDX (16 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAEX (32.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: RGAEX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.00 vs. WFPDX (-25.55). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.98 vs. WFPDX (-50.00).
| RGAEX | WFPDX | RGAEX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.00 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.08 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.051 | -0.684 | -1,324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 1.24B | 28,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.00 | -25.55 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.68 | -8.54 | -500% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.98 | -50.00 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.92 | -29.47 | -359% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement