Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs SGFFX
RGAFX vs SGFFX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs SGFFX
RGAFX vs SGFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. SGFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Hold and SGFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SGFFX (74M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than SGFFX: RGAFX (0.46) vs SGFFX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than SGFFX: RGAFX (24 years) vs SGFFX (28 years). SGFFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SGFFX (2.25). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGFFX: RGAFX (250) vs SGFFX (1000). SGFFX (12.73) and RGAFX (12.49) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.71 vs. SGFFX (5.08).
| RGAFX | SGFFX | RGAFX / SGFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.78 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.78 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.854 | 1.940 | 456% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 74M | 487,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 12.73 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.06 | 68.67 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.71 | 5.08 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.55 | 227.05 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement